User talk:Kyah117
|
File:Renault Midlum France boissons - Heineken- Strasbourg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
195.42.56.44 17:35, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
Permission
[edit]I have emailed on permission for
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Airport_Police_Officers_on_the_beat.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Airport_Police_Dog_Unit_patrolling_near_Dublin_Airport.jpg
I agree to publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).]
To the email address as directed.
Regards
Teagasc
Many no permission tags
[edit]Hello Kyah117,
I noticed that you tagged a lot of files with "no permission". But that was wrong for at least some images which I stumbled upon while categorizing them. For example File:Sameera Aziz, most beautiful journalist.jpg - there is no evidence, that the image is no own work. It has EXIF information and all other websites where it can be found have a later date than the commons upload. If you find a picture that is clearly stolen from the internet, use the {{Copyvio}} tag with a link to the original source. Please use "no permission" only, if an uploader names another source than himself without showing why this file is freely usable. Tx --Funfood ␌ 21:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
Port de Mulhouse
[edit]Hello^^ j'ai vu ta catégorie Category:Port Autonome de Mulhouse mais à priori le terme "port autonome" n'est pas très présent à mulhouse, le terme commercial du grand port de marchandises serait plutôt "Ports de Mulhouse-Rhin" (si c'est bien le port de marchandises que tu appelles port autonome). Et à priori la photo qui compose pour l'instant la catégorie n'en ferait pas partie car là il s'agit du port de plaisance de Mulhouse qui dépend de la CCI mais pas des ports de Mulhouse-Rhin, ces derniers ayant trois sites: Huningue (port de fleuve vers Bâle), Ile Napoléon (port du canal) et Ottmarsheim (port de fleuve à hauteur de Mulhouse vers la frontière allemande). Qu'en est-il au juste? Tu voulais inclure quel port dans cette catégorie? merci pour ta réponse. Jeriby (talk) 17:05, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
- Salut !
- A priori, même si le terme n'est pas utilisé, ça reste un des ports autonomes de France, mais je me suis rendu quelques secondes après crée l'article sur WP:fr que je l'avais mal nommé.
- Il faudrait peut être effectivement renommer la catégorie mais de fait, elle se viderait puisqu'on a aucune photo des installations (peu importe le site : Huningue, etc), ce qui est bien dommage puisque c'est le 3e port fluvial de France...
- Par contre, les Ports de Mulhouse-Rhin dépendent à priori de la CCI du coin.
- Cordialement, Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 10:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
- Merci pour ta réponse mais donc est-ce que le petit bout de port de plaisance fait quand même partie de ce qu'on appelle le "port autonome"? Si le terme englobe en effet tout (plaisance et marchandise) à la limite pour le moment oui on peut laisser la catégorie telle quelle. Merci! Jeriby (talk) 16:08, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Gare de Strasbourg
[edit]Bonjour Kyah117, je vous informe que la catégorie Gare de Strasbourg n'est qu'une catégorie "dépotoir" pour tous les fichiers qu'on ne peut ranger dans aucune de ses sous-catégories. Concernant les diverses photos de la bulle de verre, elles ont leur place dans Category:Facade of gare de Strasbourg ( quand prises du dehors) et Category:Interior of Gare de Strasbourg ( quand prises du dedans ). Je vous écris parce que ceci, cela, etc. D'ailleurs, si l'envie vous prenait de créer des catégories supplémentaires, allez-y ( mais personne ne vous paiera pour le faire :-) ).Cordialement, --Edelseider (talk) 15:49, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
[edit]Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!
[edit]- ⧼Wikibase-terms/Kyah117⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, français, magyar, italiano, македонски, 日本語, русский, svenska
Dear Wikimedians,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
[edit]Picture of the Year 2013 Results
[edit]- In other languages: Deutsch, español, français, 日本語, Nederlands, русский, svenska, Türkçe, українська
Dear Kyah117,
The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).
- In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
- In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)
We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:
- 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
- In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
- In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.
Click here to view the top images »
We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.
Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
[edit]Après l'effort, le réconfort.
Pierre Rudloff (talk) 10:19, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
File:Korn Logo Black.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Bertrouf (talk) 10:27, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.
Dear Kyah117,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:44, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Your VFC installation method is deprecated
[edit]Hello Kyah117, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Subway of New York - Line 1.theora.ogv
[edit]Hi, I thought you might like to know that I've tagged your video, File:Subway of New York - Line 1.theora.ogv, for Media of the Day for 7 June 2017. Seagull123 (talk) 21:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Convoi diplomatique in Paris, 2013.ogv
[edit]Hi, I thought you might like to know that I've tagged your video, File:Convoi diplomatique in Paris, 2013.ogv, for Media of the Day for 29 July 2017. Seagull123 (talk) 12:46, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oh didn't see the previous message ! Well, thanks ! Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 07:50, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Arlanda Express, centralstation, 2016 - 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Chris j wood (talk) 15:24, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2017 is open!
[edit]You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2017 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in R2.
Dear Kyah117,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2017 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the twelfth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2017) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1475 candidate images. There are 58 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top 2 from each sub-category.
In the final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2017.
Round 2 will end on 22 July 2018, 23:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 11:33, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:31, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open!
[edit]Dear Kyah117,
You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.
In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.
Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:04, 16 March 2019 (UTC)
Ooops, my bad
[edit]No, certainly not a Porsche. Thanx for correcting. Cheers!--AutomobilePassion (talk) 17:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Photographer's Barnstar | |
Bonjour ! Je vous remercie sincèrement pour vos apports photographiques venant illustrer les articles relatifs à l'administration pénitentiaire. Bonne continuation ! Amiral Bouclettes (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2019 (UTC) |
- Oh merci ! J'essaye de photographier les objets ou domaines abandonnés ou oubliés des bons photographes libristes . Merci ! Je vois que ça bosse dur de votre côté aussi ! Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 22:37, 15 December 2019 (UTC)
File:Police Xsara tour Montparnasse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Chantier PMC de Strasbourg, août 2013 - 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Chantier PMC de Strasbourg, août 2013 - 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 06:28, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Infos et mises à jour à réaliser concernant les pages CTS (réseau [concernant les bus])
[edit]Bonjour ! Je viens tout juste de créer ce compte Wikimédia mais j'ai déjà vu toutes vos photos plusieurs fois et elles sont toujours aussi intéressantes ! Le problème était la partie "parc des sous-traitants" de la page CTS... ayant des amis conducteurs chez les Autocars Striebig groupe Keolis (parce que certains ne veulent pas qu'on disent "Keolis-Striebig" car sur le logo, Keolis est en petit...) dont https://www.flickr.com/photos/148217283@N06/ qui me disent pleins d'infos concernant leur parc... c'est pourquoi il faut changer :
- il faudrait mettre la partie "livrées" à jour concernant les nouvelles...
- corriger le "Voyages Striebig" dans le tableau de l'exploitation des lignes en "Striebig-Keolis"
- les Taxibus ne sont plus sous-traités par Striebig... et les Flex'hops sont, pour certains, sous-sous-traités à Antoni Voyages...
- Striebig exploite aussi la ligne "Renfort 260" et la renfort 50 n'existe plus..
- ce n'est plus Kunegel mais LK Kunegel
- GTS n'existe plus car le dépôt du Port du Rhin à été revendu et Eschenlauer n'est plus présent sur le réseau CTS...
- Concernant le parc Striebig :
- il y a (actuellement) 3 Citaro Facelift (+ le AC-007-NX de réserve (qui est actuellement au dépôt Striebig de Brumath) - Striebig n'a plus de Citaro C2... le dernier est mort de fatigue en novembre 2023... c'était lui : https://tc-infos.fr/id/36074 - Striebig n'a plus de Citaro LE Ü depuis début 2023... mais un LE Ü C2 est arrivé en septembre : https://tc-infos.fr/id/59193 - Striebig va recevoir 10 Iveco Crossway LE City NP (ils sont au garage Iveco - Garage Elsass d'Illkirch et vont partir au dépôt CTS (UPC) pour mettre les girouettes, valideurs, ... - Striebig a beaucoup plus de Crossway Pop NP... je vais voir tous ceux que j'ai déjà noté : 211093, 21094, 211097(girouette)(fait la R-260), 211098, 211099 (ligne Entzheim), 211100, 211102, 211103, 211106, 211107, 211109,
- LK n'a plus de S416 NF et Antoni plus de Setra
- il n'y a plus aucun Solaris Urbino 12 de tout le réseau... ni à la CTS ni chez Eschenlauer...
- il n'y a plus de Nissan e-NV200 sur le service Flex'hop... il y a juste les Mercedes et des fois, des Renault Trafic de Striebig (immatriculés FF-?93-?S ?)
- il y a des Flex'hops numérotés : de V151 à V170 (avec immatriculations FW-) [sauf 163 que je n'ai jamais croisé], des sans numéros (en FW- ) et 4 de V171 à V174 (immat. GG- -KL)...
- ce n'est pas Antoni qui a les Karsan... c'est Striebig et il y en a 7...
- les MMI Urby sont au garage Iveco (Elsass) d'Illkirch...
-les nouveaux Urbanway BHNS sont pour certains à Kibitzenau en renforts de Cronembourg qui n'ont plus de place...
Voilà pour toutes ces infos...il y aurait d'autres trucs à améliorer mais voilà déjà ça...
A bientôt !
HBGX327_CTS
https://www.flickr.com/photos/199009582@N06/
PS : pourriez-vous m'aider à comprendre les outils Wikimédia ? C'est un peu compliqué... HBGX327 CTS (talk) 17:49, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Bonjour et bienvenue !
- Ici c'est Wikimedia Commons, un hébergeur de photos. C'est plutôt sur Wikipedia qu'il faut discuter de cela directement !
- Mais je vais te répondre ici, c'est plus simple, ton compte est normalement aussi crée sur Wikipedia du coup. Merci pour les photos tout d'abord ! C'est une passion au fil des années mais je n'ai pas le bon équipement ni d'ailleurs le talent d'un photographe. J'ai pris des milliers de photos depuis 15 ans pour illustrer un peu mieux Wikipedia. Les photos doivent en effet être libres de droit et les bons photographes qui contribuent par ici, oublient souvent les objets du quotidien, moins passionnants il est vrai pour certains. Donc je voulais compenser un peu cela là où je vais. Mais tout le monde peut le faire - et souvent bien mieux que moi hehe.
- Tout d'abord, tu peux tout à fait modifier tout cela directement, c'est là la magie de Wikipedia ! Par contre, le problème dans nos sujets de transports en commun, ce sont les sources. En effet, on a des grands débats sur ce sujet. Il faut normalement systématiquement sourcer les modifications (avec un lien, un article de presse, etc). Et à part les sites d'états de parcs amateurs, on a pas grand chose pour sourcer. Donc on actualise tout de même histoire de, mais c'est plutôt une tolérance entre contributeurs transports.
- Tu peux donc actualiser certaines parties, il faut tout de même garder en tête que c'est un article encyclopédique, on ne peut pas rentrer autant dans le détail que pour des sites ou forums de passionnés. Je vais regarder pour actualiser aussi par rapport à ce que tu as dis !
- Je n'ai plus trop le temps je t'avoue pour contribuer et former des nouveaux (le temps de réponse le prouve je pense... mes excuses !), le mieux serait que tu t'adresses sur Wikipedia à "Wikipédia:Forum des nouveaux", tu peux poser des questions et te faire accompagner, ils sont assez efficaces !
- J'essayerais de revenir si tu as à nouveau des questions mais je te conseille d'aller plutôt sur Wikipedia pour la suite.
- Bon courage, à très bientôt ! Kyah117 [Let's talk about it!] 18:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)