User talk:DaxServer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

empty description

[edit]

Otherwise empty descriptions seem to create a few problems [1][2][3][4]. Maybe this is sufficient to track them. I fixed all it found. Enhancing999 (talk) 11:54, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the headsup. I updated the regex pattern. Let me know if you find other errors. I'll keep an eye on that parsing error category ;) -- DaxServer (talk) 13:11, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to go quite smoothly, but there seem to be ever more than I first thought. I made a category for potential problems: [5]. Enhancing999 (talk) 14:12, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stray text

[edit]

Just noticed that some files have a the template text all over: [6]. I can try to find and fix them after the bot run. Enhancing999 (talk) 10:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! The text is messing up the regex. Hopefully they're manageably low in numbers for manual corrections! -- DaxServer (talk) 10:51, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They do seem rare: I found them looking for "please" in the source [7] (a few other image titles and other notes remain). Enhancing999 (talk) 10:54, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The notices seem mostly gone by now: thanks for that! Creator template could still be added to ca. 8700 files. Do you plan to do that? Enhancing999 (talk) 11:00, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, I'll do that after the weekend ;) -- DaxServer (talk) 11:22, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Enhancing999 I started it now -- DaxServer (talk) 10:16, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BotRequest

[edit]

Re. -"I, "

Hi Dax, thank you for the message that you want to do the cleanup of these typo's, which seem to be leftovers from image transfers from wikipedia's to commons around 2007/2008 ... I think we can savely ignore a lot of the discussion that really belongs in the template discussion page, where all the confusion and messing comes from in the fist place. Because this case is just about fixing a bunch of typo's not about new legalistic approaches or statements. But since it in the official license chapter, I won't touch this on this massive scale, 23k items. If you agree, I would be happy to see these typo's fixed. Thanks Peli (talk) 22:57, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Pelikana I do wish there is a consensus but it seems we have to wait a bit longer than anticipated! -- DaxServer (talk) 08:40, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, yes I see. And now I also doubt a bit about touching these PD licenses at all, (where the authors in later days probably would have used cc-by-sa) It's a small typo error, that i can live with, and would be just a cosmetic fix after all. Peli (talk) 08:48, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marlboro Advance Perforated Holes Filter (India).png

[edit]
This file is a copyright violation because it comes from: https://www.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/evmn66/til_that_light_cigarettes_are_designed_to_fool

The said reddit post has a URL of the Wiki page on which this image was placed, and reddit crawled wiki to read that image, not vice-versa.

Request you to please indulge in deletion with diligence so that to avoid deleting valid images and wasting time of editors in restoring them. Thank you, User4edits (talk) 05:19, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User:CuratorBot

[edit]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! -- DaxServer (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kumar_Gandharva_Shankara

[edit]
Category discussion warning

Kumar Gandharva Shankara has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−


 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DaxServer&oldid=918756126"