Commons:Help desk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shortcuts

Shortcut: COM:HD

This help desk is a forum for questions and help on:
How to use Commons

Anyone, from newbie to experienced, can ask a question here. Questions will be replied to here as well. Any answers you receive are not legal advice and the responder cannot be held liable for them.

Ask your question

or

In order to get quick answers consider the following points:

Resolved sections (marked by {{section resolved|1=~~~~}}) will be archived after two days. Sections with no discussion will be archived after ten days. The latest archive is Commons:Help desk/Archive/2024/09.

For quicker help, join our live chat room. webchat
Translate this page
COMMONS DISCUSSION PAGES
 SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} after 2 days and sections whose most recent comment is older than 10 days.


Help needed with 1900-images

[edit]

Hello! I create a Wiki-version of an encyclopaedia based on a book I transcribed and the images for which I scanned from an original copy of the book. Due to the scope of the image requirements (ca. 1900 images, 983.5 MB) I need some help concerning questions about meta data, categorization, file naming, and the upload process, as well. I put together (hopefully) all relevant information on my user page (User:CalRis25) and marked open questions in red. I tried to answer as many questions as possible based on the Help-pages, but could use some help with the rest. Due to the large number of images every error would propagate 1900 times. I would like to avoid that. You can answer here or on the Talk-page of my user page. Thank you in advance for your help. CalRis25 (talk) 12:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry that nobody seems to have answered. There are some tools that you might want to use, and people experienced with such tasks – it seems they don't read this page. You may have better luck at Commons:Village Pump. You could also take a look at Commons:Guide to batch uploading for some instructions. You might want to start by uploading a few images and ask for comments on them, to have a better chance to get everything right for the mass upload. –LPfi (talk) 09:26, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, LPfi, for your answer. I am currently reading up about OpenRefine, which seems to be the right tool for this job. I will do as you suggest, and make a sample image-upload and ask for comments. Bye. CalRis25 (talk) 08:04, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


how to change the outdated information

[edit]

en:File:Samsung Electronics logo (english).svg

I work at Samsung Elec. a brand mamaging dept. I found the logo in above page has outdated logo. and I am afraid I do not have the authority to change it. Can you help me to update it? Osolemio22 (talk) 11:42, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Osolemio22: Hi, and welcome. Where may we find the up-to-date logo and permission for it?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:00, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.samsung.com/us/about-us/brand-identity/logo/
THANK YOU Osolemio22 (talk) 12:47, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Osolemio22: That page is "Copyright© 1995-2024 SAMSUNG All Rights Reserved." May we use the licensing from File:Samsung Electronics logo (english).svg, "{{Licensed-TOO|{{TOO-SK}}|{{PD-textlogo}}{{trademark}}}}"?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:03, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The current image is tagged {{Licensed-TOO|{{TOO-SK}}|{{PD-textlogo}}. The new version seems to involve less creative design than the current one. Why would we need a licence? Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pigsonthewing: I don't think so, due to the manual kerning. Pinging @Fetx2002 as uploader. We don't even have a current "Samsung Electronics logo (english)" to reference (or do we?).   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't believe that mere kerning would cross the ToO. (Fetx2002 made their last edit on 10 June 2018.) Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"There is one error with the forms above. Correct the error, and try submitting again" but cannot find error.

[edit]

I am attempting to uplaod three images to Wikicommons and it will not allow me to due to "one error" but I do not see any place on the form where it lets me know where exactly the error has occured. Unsure how to proceed. Gavingaebe (talk) 18:06, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging @Sannita (WMF) because this sounds like there is a UI problem in the Upload Wizard. (I believe Sannita is on vacation, though, so I wouldn't expect a rapid response here).
@Gavingaebe: I see you did some uploads successfully after this, so I'm guessing you worked it out. What was the problem, so the dev team can have a chance to fix the notification? - Jmabel ! talk 22:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I decided to upload only one image of the object I photographed instead of 3 and that seems to have "fixed" the issue so i'm not sure what the error actually was. Haven't encountered it since. Thanks! Gavingaebe (talk) 21:38, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Gavingaebe @Jmabel Hi, I'm back from vacation, and I'm slowly getting to answer notifications. It seems that the problem is still present, I know I got a Phabricator ticket about it just today, and I'll try to get the team to it as soon as possible. Thanks anyway for letting me know! Sannita (WMF) (talk) 13:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What license to use

[edit]

I've found an image here [1] which I want to upload, it says it can be used, shared, copied and distributed free of charge, for credit. I've never uploaded an image before is that image ok to upload and what license would it come under? Thanks Spiderpig662 (talk) 15:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spiderpig662: sure looks old enough that I'd expect that is in the public domain. Do they not give any information about its provenance? - Jmabel ! talk 19:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: it says it was taken in 1886/1887 in Bergen. --Spiderpig662 (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Spiderpig662: Almost certainly PD, though there are weird edge cases. Is the photographer known (and is their death date known)? Do we have a known first date of publication? - Jmabel ! talk 20:36, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: The photographer isn't known and I'm not sure of first date of publication. --Spiderpig662 (talk) 21:03, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Spiderpig662: The Norway side is easy, because publication date doesn't matter: {{PD-anon-70}}.
The U.S. side is tricky. Mercifully, URAA shouldn't come into play, because it was already PD in Norway in 1996.
  • If it was first published anywhere before 1929, it's {{PD-US-expired}}.
  • If it was first published outside the U.S. 1929 through 28 February 1989 inclusive, and didn't conform to U.S. formalities, it's {{PD-1996}}, and if that was 1929-1964 it would have to have conformed to U.S. formalities including copyright renewal (very unlikely), so it would also almost certainly be {{PD-1996}}.
  • Also, if it was first published 2003 or later, then {{PD-old-70}} covers the U.S.
So the ugly cases are:
  • first published (anywhere) 1929 - 28 February 1989 and conformed to U.S. formalities (that would give it 95 years in the U.S. from publication date)
  • first published (anywhere) 1 March 1989 through 2002 (that would give it 95 years in the U.S. from publication date)
I'd consider that first ugly case very unlikely, so if this was first published on or before 28 February 1989, or on or after 1 January 2003, you should be good on one or another basis. Sadly, if it was first published in that ~14-year window, it will be copyrighted in the U.S. for a long time.
Yeah, it's very weird and very convoluted because we lack publication info. You might want to take this to Commons:Village pump/Copyright and see if someone more expert has thoughts; if you do, make sure either to copy-paste my analysis or to use a permalink and link this thread as the start of your discussion. - Jmabel ! talk 21:39, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel: I'll see what they think. Thanks for all your help! --Spiderpig662 (talk) 17:35, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Maurice Bonneau

[edit]

To whom it may concern:

I'm sorry but you are using a wrong photo, please change it. It's not him on the photo. Jean-Maurice Bonneau is not in the photo you are using about him. Thank you.

Beth Madden 2.39.143.13 19:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please give a link to the photo or the place where it is used. Otherwise it is hard to find the problem (how can we even know that a page by that name is the problematic one?).–LPfi (talk) 09:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Presumably File:Jean-Maurice Bonneau (FRA) 2010.jpg and the group photo it is derived from. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:33, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Share Alike"

[edit]

When the image I use is under the "Share Alike" clause, "If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original", am I expected to add the image to Wikimedia Commons? I have done so in the past but y'all appear to have removed it. I don't mind that you did; I just want to be in compliance with the rules. Tkthrasher (talk) 22:06, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tkthrasher: The share-alike clause means that if you publish your work somewhere, then you must offer it under the same or compatible license as the original. It does not force you to upload it anywhere in particular, or even to publish it at all. So, no, you are not expected to upload your work to Commons unless you want to and you think it is in scope for Commons. The account Tkthrasher never uploaded anything to Commons. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:32, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Also, "share-alike" applies only to what derives from that particular image (or other work). If (for example) you retouch an image and use it in a book, your retouched image must offer the same "viral" license, but the book does not need to. - Jmabel ! talk 17:01, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NoFoP-Morocco

[edit]

Hello,

these photos were deleted on the grounds that Morocco does not have the freedom to take photos of buildings on public streets (NoFoP), but I would like to understand the following, please:

- Can I re-upload the photos and change the type of license (Commercial license)? Or is it forbidden?

- If it is forbidden, why don't you delete thousands of photos of Moroccan buildings on public streets on Wikimedia Common?

Thank you Mounir Neddi (talk) 00:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We don't host images that cannot be used commercially (and it is not up to you to choose licence on works of others). Some do slip through, but they are deleted when found.
However, for the copyright law of Morocco to require permission from the architect, the architecture must be the main subject of the photo (which is not the case in many cityscape photos) and it must be special enough to be considered a "work" under copyright law. (Similarly with signs etc.)
–LPfi (talk) 09:59, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of first version Ducati Supersport S

[edit]

Hello,

I know about speedy deletion G7. But last time both versions were deleted :-(, so I ask here. Please remove first version only of File:2024-08 Ducati 939 Supersport-S rear.jpg,

as realized here: File:2024-05-01 230SL-Mercedes closed.jpg Thank you very much for understanding and your help. - I'm very sorry that this user-mistake happened again. KR, Wikisympathisant (talk) 08:41, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to publish information or article on wikipedia

[edit]

I want to publish or send information to Wikimedia how to publish it. 14.139.121.212 10:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is Wikimedia Commons, a media repository. For the English-langauge Wikipedia, please ask at en:WP:Teahouse. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:03, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Batch upload limits with OpenRefine

[edit]

Using partliemntarch and freely available data, I have created over 1388 .svg files representing municipal chambers of medium and major cities Brazilian (more than 100k citizens) for 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2016 and 2020 elections. I wish to upload them to Commons so they may be used on articles onn portuguese Wikipedia about for their respective elections (example use in an article). I have experimented with using the OpenRefine tool to perform the batch upload of the images (see sample upload here). My questions are:

  • is there a rate limit to the rate of files I can upload at a time? If so, would OpenRefine take this rate into account or should I separate the files in smaller batches myself?
  • to perform this upload would I need a bot account or can it be done from my regular user account?

Thank you in advance. Pfcab (talk) 13:24, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How can I unlock my account?

[edit]

I made a mistake few times and my account was blocked how can I unlock my account to make everything correct? Marketilo (talk) 20:40, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were blocked in the Russian Wikipedia. You can request unblocking there – please read ru:ВП:РАЗБЛОК for instructions. --Geohakkeri (talk) 21:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

helping me get the right settings in my phone

[edit]

attended game I am fed up a fasting Google 12 me a candidate I am a British citizen I was born in this country I do not play games I do not shame my information with food party but Google things are living New York but I don't I will I purely on my speaker in my phone but I can't read the right so I can't check if I said the right thing I am I am a British citizen but I'm Welsh but I can't speak Welsh so I think this in my phone but they're getting too confused because I can't speak Welsh so that's why I have English in my phone and my broadband is be will be key for our five years but it's coming up false information all the time and my phone is contact with e mobile phone contract mobile phone for the last five years I am moved companies and I pay all my brothers the only better I don't pay his TV licence because I don't watch BBC one and I got sky TV the full package so again did a gay I pay wells water gas electric my cut logs so again all the masked new for is a bit of help I am fed up of asking Google throughout me I do not work I'm not sure I'll do work when I set up to Google they said the information they told the government I am working but I'm not able to work I'm on sacral benefits I'm on pap and universal credit I'm not allowed to work so when I said after them they changed it all again they should be sharing my information my location is thrust two years you can ask Google even got my train ticket by once a month on transport Wiggles attended the damn fed up with my phone telling the mission 2A00:23C6:98A4:E101:189B:CA3A:CA54:139F 00:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk is for getting help with Wikimedia Commons. You'll need to get help on another website. -Waterard water?(talk | contribs) 00:57, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Broken File: "File:Départements_et_régions_de_France_-_Noname-2016.svg"

[edit]

The file File:Départements_et_régions_de_France_-_Noname-2016.svg is broken, in the sense that the file doesn't render (both Safari and Chrome, so likely not browser specific) on the file page or on wikipedia. When visiting https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/D%C3%A9partements_et_r%C3%A9gions_de_France_-_Noname-2016.svg, there is a parser error at the top of the page and a rendering of the page up to the first error. The specific parser error mentioned is "error on line 735 at column 35: Namespace prefix Inkscape for label on path is not defined". How can this be fixed? TheTrueShaman (talk) 00:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTrueShaman: Hi, and welcome. It works for me on Chrome Version 127.0.6533.101 (Official Build) (64-bit). Pinging @Hairy Dude, Otourly as uploaders.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:34, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: The file was fixed by Hairy Dude the day before you responded. Thanks for checking anyways! TheTrueShaman (talk) 03:23, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nudity policy

[edit]

Not sure if this is the right place for this question but I’ll see. I was looking through images of nudists and have a question. A few of these (I can link examples if they are needed) include children. I am not prudish when it comes to nudity and know Wikimedia can include this type of content but it feels iffy when it comes to children. None of what I’ve seen seems to meet US law’s definition of harmful media though which requires for example “lascivious exhibition of the anus, genitals, or pubic area of any person;”. Should I propose these for deletion? Has this topic been addressed before? Clyde Jimpson of the Arkansas String Beans (talk) 02:02, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Clyde Jimpson of the Arkansas String Beans: If you believe the material in question actually could raise legal issues in the U.S., then do not link it here, which is liable to draw in more viewers before it can be removed. Instead, e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org. - Jmabel ! talk 04:46, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did see that on the policy page I read about deletions. Makes sense. I don’t know if it actually is a violation though. Doesn’t seem like it really. I’m not legal expert so thought I’d ask. Clyde Jimpson of the Arkansas String Beans (talk) 07:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Clyde Jimpson of the Arkansas String Beans: Bear in mind that many people have strong views on the topics of nudity and sexuality. Therefore, it is almost certain that an image you have doubts about has already been scrutinised. However, if such an image was recently uploaded, uploaded by a new account or a single-topic account, if it is not categorised in the relevant categories, if the name of the image and its description do not indicate the content, then it is likely that it has slipped through the checks so far, and then you should report it to the above email address. C.Suthorn (@Life_is@no-pony.farm - p7.ee/p) (talk) 12:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Santa Rosa, CA

[edit]

Hello. I am trying to upload an SVG version of the Flag of Santa Rosa, California. I remastered it on Inkscape on Aug 24, 2024. I'm wondering what copyright categories I should place it in before I upload it.

Cheers, Yeetstuff (talk) 06:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I'm not completely sure I understand your question (we don't usually talk about "copyright categories"), but you'll need to tag it with {{PD-CAGov}} for the design. Insofar as your own work is copyrightable, you can choose any acceptable free license; the most common are {{Cc-zero}}, {{Cc-by-4.0}}, and {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}. These are quite different from one another, and licensing is irrevocable, so if you are not already familiar with these licenses you should familiarize yourself before choosing. - Jmabel ! talk 16:55, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can't i upload this type of images from flickr?

[edit]

For example some images has a license called Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic on Flickr. It says we are free to share and adapt! Is it allowed on wikipedia commons or its not? Ilikeyoutoo yay (talk) 06:16, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ilikeyoutoo yay, Not. "NonCommercial" is the deal-breaker, see Commons:Licensing#Well-known_licenses. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 07:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks :) Ilikeyoutoo yay (talk) 07:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to categorize a video where the videographer makes a full turn during the recording?

[edit]

I made this selfie video some years ago. Apart from the wrong name (actually mirrors at four walls, not three), I deem it appropriate to have it in a category where the "one full turn during video" character is accounted for. There are some categories with "360 degrees" in the name, but they seem all to be for panoramic views, meaning the seen image already covers the full 360 degrees from left to right border. Any hints where I could put it? Or should I create a category? Pittigrilli (talk) 12:50, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From your description, it would be a 360° pan. - Jmabel ! talk 16:56, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logos con SVG

[edit]

Buenas, en Wikimedia se puede publicar Logos con código (SVG)?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:09, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AbchyZa22: Sí, con los mismos consideraciones acerca de derechos como cualquier otro archivo. - Jmabel ! talk

Are cropped images made from non-free images always considered non-free?

[edit]

When the original image is non-free, does the cropped image qualify as the non-free image even if the cropped image alone can be considered public domain? Also, if I extract the logo from the non-free PDF file, does it always considered the non-free image? Momiji-Penguin (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)Momiji-Penguin (talk) 05:36, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Momiji-Penguin: Hi, and welcome. The answers to both are no, so please be more specific. What crops and licensing are you considering, and why?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:29, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for answering. Specific examples would be cropping a logo from this SVG image (File:Izutsuyatsuhashihonpo logo.svg), or extracting a logo from this PDF file (File:Sword Art Online anime flat logo.svg). Initially, I thought these logos could be licensed under {{PD-textlogo}}. But on second thought, I thought that since these sources are non-free, it's possible that these logos are non-free as well. Momiji-Penguin (talk) 13:05, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Momiji-Penguin: I think your first instinct to upload them was right, but please see COM:DW and COM:Japan given the explicit copyright claims.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any image on wikimedia subject to copyright?is Every image on wikimedia under CC0 license?

[edit]

As the title says, I would like to know if there is an image on wikipedia that is not under cc0 license or has some sort of restriction? 150.249.195.211 09:17, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A majority of the content here is protected by copyright. See COMM:LICENSE for various acceptable licenses. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
To be clear, "Wikimedia" generally refers to the Wikimedia Foundation or the broader Wikimedia movement, "Wikipedia" is a collection of 300+ encyclopedias written in many languages, "MediaWiki" is the software that is used on these wikis, "wikis" are collecctions of interlinked documents that can be edited by several users, and this site is "Wikimedia Commons", which is one of the 800+ wikis that are built by various Wikimedians and whose hosting and trademarks are controlled by the Wikimedia Foundation. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 11:11, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The short answer is "no". Assuming you are talking about Wikimedia Commons, the licensing status of each image is indicated on the respective file page.
Everything here should be either free-licensed or in the public domain both in its "home" country and in the U.S. Some of what is here on a pure "public domain" basis might still be in copyright in some other country, so be careful if you are not either in the U.S. or in the country of origin for the file. "Free licenses" vary a great deal. CC-0 is by no means the most common. A lot more common are CC-BY and CC-BY-SA licenses, which require you to give an attribution, usually to the photographer in question. If you have a specific file where you are trying to understand the licensing, feel free to ask. - Jmabel ! talk 22:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

هل يمكنني أن انشر مقال كتابة شخصية عن قضية اجتماعية؟

[edit]

طلب حكم الهلال الشريفي (talk) 15:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Google Translate: Can I publish a personal essay on a social issue?
حكم الهلال الشريفي: No. Please read Commons:Project_scope/ar. Yann (talk) 16:19, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of Hussein Onn

[edit]

Since we can't be certain if his photo is from before 1963 or possibly after, and whether it can be freely used without copyright restrictions, do you think we should consider removing it? Baginda 480 (talk) 16:01, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

His other photo also write taken before 1963, I think I need to ask everbody Baginda 480 (talk) 16:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
FWIW, Hussein Onn in en-wiki describes this photo as "Official Potrait [sic] 1973". That edit was made by User:Shahril4487, who has very few edits, all on en-wiki and all within less than 20 minutes on one day, so probably a throwaway account. - Jmabel ! talk 23:49, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Pinging @CaradoWindows as uploader. - Jmabel ! talk 23:52, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That's why I'm curious if the date of this image is fabricated or set just to evade copyright law, especially since COM:Malaysia has written, "Because the 1987 extension was not retroactive, works made by authors who died before 1962 are in the public domain in both Malaysia and the US according to URAA, as well as anonymous, cinematographic, photographic, sound recording, broadcast, or corporate works published prior to 1962." Baginda 480 (talk) 02:27, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, i took the 1963 date from this other file, uploaded in 2013: File:Tun Hussein Onn (MY 3rd PM).jpg
However, looking now, their reference is a dead link. The information on this photo is very unclear. CaradoWindows (talk) 15:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've searched extensively online and found no information about these photos, nor any evidence proving they were taken before 1963. Baginda 480 (talk) 15:10, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, I was going to request the deletion, but someone else did it already
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tun Hussein Onn potrait.jpg CaradoWindows (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Old Photos

[edit]

Good morning

Can you tell me how old photos can be removed from WikiCommons? CQuick (talk) 02:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Typically, someone who uploads a piece of media can ask for it to be deleted with no more justification within a brief period of time. If a piece of media has been here for a long time, there will have to be some kind of reason why they should be deleted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:16, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Generally there needs to be a reason for it to be deleted. Commons:Deletion policy. If you are thinking of any type of old photos in particular, you might get a more detailed answer if you specify. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrogmation, @Justin How do I go about doing this? Its old headshots of myself. A new one has been added so though it would be best to take the older ones away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CQuick (talk • contribs) 16:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CQuick: my first gut is "absolutely not". This is a photo archive that is at least partly in service of an encyclopedia. Images that show what someone or something looked like at some date in the past are of more or less the same importance here as recent images. - Jmabel ! talk 19:09, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel That's a fair point. I'm happy to keep the photos up in that case. CQuick (talk) 12:19, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Downloading an Image on

[edit]

Can I download an image from Wikimedia commons and use it on my website if it has the following rights under its description? and if I put the attribute in the description section of the image does that mean am okay to use it?

You are free: to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work to remix – to adapt the work Under the following conditions:attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use. share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original. Js Trent (talk) 12:00, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Js Trent There is a link "Cite this page" in the left hand menu item. My experience is that choosing the style you wish from the list with opens on the page for the file you wish to use is perfectly sufficient. Others may give you additional advice.
An example is File:Tun Hussein Onn potrait.jpg where the "cite" link opens thus 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 14:23, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Js Trent and Timtrent: actually, that is not a correct answer. That is how to cite the page in a bibliography, not how to attribute it when reusing.
Different images have different licenses, and so the requirements differ. Js Trent, it sounds like you are describing a CC-BY-SA license of some sort.
  • You must link to the specific license (which would mean having a specific version number for the license, which I can't even guess from what you wrote here). Online, that should certainly be a live link to a URL.
  • You must give "appropriate credit". If the file page specifies a particular attribution use, that. Otherwise, it will typically be something like "Wikimedia Commons user such-and-such". If you say what file you are talking about I can give you a specific answer.
I could be much more specific if you would say exactly what file you are talking about, rather than just quote part of the license summary. - Jmabel ! talk 19:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel I'm grateful for the correction. It seems counter-intuitive, though, that the cite link does not do the job one might expect it to. Perhaps Commons needs a menu link to "Create Attribution"? 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:26, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Timtrent: That would be the "Use this file" link. Yes, it would be much clearer if they were near one another; not under my control. - Jmabel ! talk 22:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel Thank you. Took me ages to find that link, hiding in plain sight! The wording of that link is not exactly obvious, until, of course, it is.
My apologies @Js Trent for misleading you in good faith! 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:57, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Logo de TotalEnergies

[edit]

Buenas, se puede publicar el Logo de Total Energies (https://totalenergies.com/company/identity/history), fundada en 1924 en Francia??Estará al Dominio Público?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

¿Sabes en cual año empezaron a utilizar el logo este? ¿Y en cual país tienen su sede? - Jmabel ! talk 19:12, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel:Buenas, TotalEnergies fundó en 1924 pero el primer logo creó en 1954 por ejemplo (https://1000logos.net/total-logo/) estará al Dominio Público tanto Francia como EEUU?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 07:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Entonces el logo es de 2021 y el COM:TOO será de fráncia. La ley francés srefiere a « l'empreinte de la personnalité de l'auteur » (la huella de la personalidad del autor), que me aparece presente en el logo este. Entonces, no supongo que nostoros podamos aceptarlo sin licencia. - Jmabel ! talk 19:20, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel:Pero y si público un Logo antiguo de 1954,se puede publicar con {{PD-textlogo}}?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
El de 1954-1955, claramente. Los de 1963-1970, 1970-1980, y 2003-2021, no estoy seguro. Los otros, no. - Jmabel ! talk 22:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
El de 1954 se puede publicar con {{PD-France}}?? AbchyZa22 (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
{{PD-textlogo}} o {{PD-ineligible}} - Jmabel ! talk 18:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jmabel:{{PD-textlogo}} AbchyZa22 (talk) 19:48, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]
An image of a BART train during the last run event on 20 April 2024

I uploaded the image on Wikimedia Commons a few days after the event on April 20. However, I found a lot of similarities of this image, such as different people posting this on X. I also posted this image, which is the same as the image on Wikimedia Commons. Both versions were taken by me.

In the meantime, I searched this image on Google Lens and the classic Google Image search. None of the images from Commons came up on these searches like the one on the right. This image was uploaded as CC0, and the other image is CC-BY-SA 4.0. When I searched "legacy BART trains" or the BART train last run event, I did not find any images of that kind on Wikipedia or Wikimedia Commons; it shows images taken from other people on social media platforms and YouTube.

After searching BART trains filtered from images from Commons in Google Images, a few images from 2023 or later showed up. Unfortunately, some images do not have a "licensable" tag, and some images contained the text "Images may be subject to copyright." Images of BART trains taken after April 2024 in Wikimedia Commons were not shown when I searched Google Images of it. I don't know why some images from Wikimedia Commons did not show up on Google Lens or Google Image search. Evan0512 (talk) 19:13, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Evan0512: What help are you requesting? We have no control over how quickly Google Lens indexes our content. - Jmabel ! talk 00:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I thought some Wikimedia Commons images were found on Google Images. I mean about specific images on Wikimedia Commons that found no results of matching images on Google Images and Google Lens, like TinEye. I requested help because I was shocked when I tried to search Google about this image as seen above, which showed little or no results for Wikimedia but similar images elsewhere. When I click Google Lens tab of a specific image on Commons, it results in a low-resolution image displayed on Google Lens. Evan0512 (talk) 06:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Evan0512: I'm sorry, that doesn't clarify what you are asking someone here to do or say. As I said, we have no control over how quickly Google Lens indexes our content. - Jmabel ! talk 19:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

I would like to ask if anyone knows of any Malaysian government websites where photos of high-ranking officials (such as the Prime Minister) are available for free use? Recently, I've been uploading photos of Mahathir Mohamad, but they are all sourced from foreign websites (like the Indonesian or Japanese government websites), and none from Malaysia. Does anyone know of any Malaysian government website where such photos can be freely used? Baginda 480 (talk) 07:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why can't I replace a painting with a better version of it?

[edit]

I want to use this versionː https://www.flickr.com/photos/magika2000/5870187312

to replace this versionː File:Saint-Philipe at Sole Bay mg 0505.jpg

For some reason commons doesn't accept that. DavidDijkgraaf (talk) 12:32, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To overwrite files, you'd need to be an autopatroller or above. Your proposed version is visually different enough that it should be uploaded as a new file (but the Flickr copyfraud of "all rights reserved" might make upload difficult). Abzeronow (talk) 17:53, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not really difficult. The source of a PD image is irrelevant to our ability to accept it, though of course it should be documented.
Download to your computer, upload to Commons. Indicate the source, but ignore the copyfraud and just give an accurate PD license. - Jmabel ! talk 19:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Especially with artworks we shouldn't replace images, but always upload as a new version. 1. The source of the image is different, but the description is not changed when replacing. So we are actually falsifying data by replacing. 2. The older version from an older source might also be an older version of the artwork. Older in the sense of before a possible restoration. Again by replacing we would not only be falsifying the description, but also destroying actual information.
What is the hassle of just uploading a new image? None really.
You can also replace your new image where the other image has been used before.
If there is a wikidata-item for the artwork, you could just replace the image in wikidata. This way your "better" image will automatically be reused interwikiwise. Wuselig (talk) 20:56, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DavidDijkgraaf: Please upload the full-resolution (2133 × 1268) version of the file. --Geohakkeri (talk) 18:13, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Upload an image of 1938

[edit]

Hello :) .

I would like to upload to Commons an image of a Cuban film from 1938. I downloaded the image from a website. I think it should be ok to upload it due to Cuban copyright laws, but I want to be sure before I do it.

Thanks in advance. Nonickillo (talk) 18:36, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know when all of the principal creators of the film died? It could still be in copyright. Cuba is 50 PMA. Abzeronow (talk) 18:46, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that the director of the film died in 1992. But about the photographers I have no information. Nonickillo (talk) 18:58, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Then this film can only be uploaded here in 2043. You could see if your local Wikipedia would accept non-free media if you plan on using the image for an article. Abzeronow (talk) 19:10, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok @Abzeronow, got it :) . That's it, I want to use it to illustrate an article. I will try fair use in this case. Thank you very much for your help. Nonickillo (talk) 20:49, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Old version of file being displayed

[edit]

I recently uploaded a new version of Anthony Ciampi seated.jpg that is of better quality and is cropped and straightened. However, when I view the file, it continues to display the old version. When I try to re-upload the new version as either a new file or to overwrite the existing one, it says it is an exact duplicate of the current file. I've tried refreshing and null edits but no change. Any ideas what's going wrong? Ergo Sum 18:19, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ergo Sum: Probably just a caching issue on your end. - Jmabel ! talk 18:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Discolored old photo

[edit]

The original color of the old photo is black and white, but it can become discolored overtime due to some reasons. This discoloration often takes on a yellow. Speaking of which, I discovered that there are two problems:

  1. Where should files about the discolored old photo be categorized? Category:Yellow photographs?
  2. The discolored old photo are no longer black and white, then should we still be placing the category "Black and white" photographs?--125.230.82.39 19:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
For example, File:Chen Tian.png shows black and white, and File:Chen Xian-cha.jpg shows yellow.--125.230.82.39 19:28, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Need to recover our page

[edit]

Hello Mr./Miss, I'm Faisal from Batterlution Ltd, Shenzhen, China. Last year our page was deleted, whose user ID and page name was " Batterluion ". My urge to the Wikipedia authority is to help us to get back our page. What procedure do we have to follow let guide us.

Thank you Faial Bin Ashab Overseas Technical Support Engineer at Batterlution Email: faisal@batterlution.com Phone/WhatsApp: +8613264910540 Batterlution (talk) 09:00, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For reference, I am unsure what page he is talking about but @Achim55 mentioned such an article here User_talk:Batterlution#Commons is not for Wikipedia articles. I have a bit of suspicion this might be self promotion, but we could import it to draftspace on wikipedia. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 09:18, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Batterlution: You are blocked on enwiki and now you are trying to drop a promotional article here on Commons which has been deleted. Even if it were written in a neutral, not advertising manner it would be out of Commons' project scope. --Achim55 (talk) 10:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

[edit]

Can everyone help me check if the image I just uploaded complies with copyright? This is my first time using a photo from that website. Baginda 480 (talk) 10:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hope everybody help me to reviewed the image Baginda 480 (talk) 10:39, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Baginda 480: Hello, You are not the German Federal Archive and you cannot use this source template. Please see the FAQ of the German Federal Archive: "May I upload pictures of the Federal Archives on Wikimedia Commons? No [...] It is explicitly prohibited for users to upload images from the Federal Archives." [2] -- Asclepias (talk) 12:37, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Asclepias: Thanks. I tagged it as a copyvio and Yann deleted it.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wall plate

[edit]

I have a wall plate made in 1886 by painter Leon Senf It is quite good condition . I am wondering if it is of interest and possibly what it would be worth. O would like to sell it if possible as I am getting older now and have no one I could appreciate it. I would very much like to know your thoughts on this please.

Kind Regards,

Helen Constant 2A02:C7C:E346:D500:9917:C27D:418B:B0A3 10:51, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My thought is that this is a page specifically for asking for help in using Wikimedia Commons, and therefore not an appropriate place to ask this. - Jmabel ! talk 18:52, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Завантаження файлів

[edit]

Файли не опубліковуються. У формах наявні 6 помилок. Виправте помилки і спробуйте знову. Які помилки? Петро Симак (talk) 14:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sannita (WMF): FYI re lack of highlights for Upload Wizard errors.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:58, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G. @Петро Симак (Sorry to reply in English) We're on it, but I cannot still tell when a fix will come. We are currently investigating this. Sannita (WMF) (talk) 15:27, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Karl Maria Wiligut

[edit]

Hi, I'm researching Karl Maria Wiligut, and I noticed that the photo of him on his Wikipedia page, and in Wikipedia Commons is actually of Himmler, and not Wiligut. I've come across several photos of Wiligut in biographies, and I'm quite sure they are correct and Wikipedia has the wrong image. However, I don't have any particular copyright permission to upload the correct image/s. Can you advise, please? Woozlette (talk) 16:02, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Woozlette: Certainly bring this up on the talk page of the Wikipedia page, and add {{Fact disputed}} with the basis of your contention to the relevant file page here on Wikimedia Commons. You don't say what Wikipedia page or what photo, and since there are articles on him in 14 languages, I'm not going to make any assumptions about what photo you are talking about. - Jmabel ! talk 18:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Making an assumption, his ear doesn't look like Himmlers.[3][4] Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 19:55, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]


File needs to be cropped - badly

[edit]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sgt._Robert_Carrington_Middleton_(1875-1916)_Leeds_Special_Constabulary.png Please make this file above only of the oval photo and leave in the name under it and the "Leeds and Yorkshire" reference - the surrounding writing/text should all go (be edited out, which I have tried to do, but FAILED).

The photo needs to be titled: Mr Robert Carrington Middleton (1875-1916)

Thanks Srbernadette (talk) 10:49, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Srbernadette: For reference, asking help with cropping files is better done at COM:GL, but I think cropping files should be the least of your concerns at the moment. What makes you think File:Sgt. Robert Carrington Middleton (1875-1916) Leeds Special Constabulary.png has been released under a {{Cc-zero}}? How do you know that the "The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of their rights to the work worldwide under copyright law"? Your screenshot of the photo states the image's copyright is owned by the "British Library Board, All Right Reserved". That might not be correct, but it's a bit of a jump to go from that to "cc-zero". Your user talk page seems to indicate that you've had issues with previous files uploaded to Commons, and it appears that you might be back at it again. For example, you uploaded File:Anne Grosvenor, Baroness Ebury and her son Francis Grosvenor, 8th Earl of Wilton.webp as {{Cc-by-2.5}} but there's no indication the file has been released as such in the newspaper article, you've cited as the source. Why do you think that file is licensed as "cc-by-2.5"? Are you just randomly selecting licenses that you think might be OK? -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:40, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am so sorry, I thought that because this photo was in a UK newspaper from 1916 that all was OK...I honestly don't know what to do...I will stop editing for sure. Sorry again. Srbernadette (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Srbernadette: I didn't post what I did to try and get you to stop editing. A photo published in a 1916 British newspaper, despite the claim made by the en:British Library Board, almost certainly seems to be within the public domain under UK copyright law per COM:United Kingdom#Ordinary copyright; so, perhaps all that needs to be done is for the licensing to be tweaked. The other image is from 1933 and that one might be trickier to assess. The main concern is that you seem to be "guessing" when it comes to licensing when you apparently don't know what to do, and seem to have been guessing for quite some time now. Maybe instead of guessing in the future, it would be better for you to ask for help first at COM:VPC before uploading a file whose copyright status you're unsure about. Many COM:Creative Commons licenses are OK for Commons, but the copyright holder has to be the one to release their work as such; so, perhaps you shouldn't use such licenses except for 100% original photos you've taken yourself, not photos of other photos taken by others or scans from websites or print publications. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Marchjuly: Right, see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Srbernadette.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 13:23, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For cropping, see https://croptool.toolforge.org
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 13:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and sorry to everyone. Thanks for your help with the CROPPING - IT WORKED!!!!
But I think it may be too big - can you please make it smaller a bit so that it looks a bit sharper?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sgt._Robert_Carrington_Middleton_(1875-1916)_Leeds_Special_Constabulary.png Srbernadette (talk) 13:51, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Srbernadette: Any png image will look fuzzy when scaled down (due to design decisions discussed in phab:T192744) or jaggy when scaled up.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems reasonable when thumbnailed (see right side). Personally, I'd crop label and outer border too.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 18:54, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

cancellazione account

[edit]

voglio cancellare il mio account poiché non lo utilizzo, come si fa? MasPro57 (talk) 14:13, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MasPro57: Hi. Please see COM:FAQ#How do I close my account?.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:27, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proper licensing

[edit]

Hello, I would like to upload photos of an event as an organization. We had a photographer release the photos stating all rights belong to us, but he would like to be credited as the photographer. What is the proper way to upload those on commons? He does not have a wiki account, and would not like to create one. He also does not have a publicly available website with a license.

Example: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SloFluffCon_2024_mayor_visit.jpg

I am almost certain this is wrong, since I uploaded as my own work - although he is credited in the EXIF. Excav (talk) 17:37, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Excav: Hi,
This should be done through COM:VRT. Either by the photographer, or by you with the documents showing that the copyright was transferred to you. Yann (talk) 18:01, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Thanks. Is there a way to sort out a release for all photos of future events as well? We do not want to bother the photographer(s) for a release for each individual image. What would you suggest here?
The photographer is a volunteer at our non-profit - if that helps speed it up?
Also - if I upload them from my own account (Excav), I can't figure out where to attribute the original photographer. Excav (talk) 18:15, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Excav: It doesn't matter who is the photographer. Copyright doesn't change whether the photographer is paid, or is a volunteer. But yes, a general release permission can be done. VRT people will explain to you what kind of documents are required in this case. Yann (talk) 18:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Excav: Photographer is "author". I've edited File:SloFluffCon 2024 mayor visit.jpg per what you say above. Feel free to edit anything I didn't quite get accurate. VRT is, indeed, still needed. The trickiest piece is going to be documenting just what materials he assigned copyright for, and to whom. I suspect the photographer is likely to need to be in the loop on the email to the VRT.
This looks like a trickier one than usual, but if you get all the relevant parties cc'd on an email to the VRT, it should work out. Do remember to follow the instructions given in Template:PP once the initial email is sent to VRT.
If anything in COM:VRT isn't clear, the place to take it up is Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard. - Jmabel ! talk 20:21, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved
I think that this question was replied to adequately based on the supplied information. If you have anything to add or a follow-up question please feel free to replace this box with your comment. This section will be archived after two days. Excav (talk) 13:48, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paste up grafitti

[edit]

Would this picture be eligible for commons? The picture was taken in London and it seems that (based on what I've found on Google) that grafitti put up illegaly is not covered by copyright, but I want to be on the safe side, a number of grafitti images I've uploaded have been deleted for (apparently not counting as 'grafitti'). StarTrekker (talk) 20:47, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@StarTrekker: COM:CB#Graffiti seems to agree with what you found on Google. In cases such as this, you might need to consider not only the copyright status of the graffiti itself, but also the photograph of it. The photo you linked to above seems to have been released under a license that's accepted by Commons; so, it would, in principle, seem to be OK to upload. One possible concern, however, could be images of en:Brian Jones and other woman (don't know who she is) appearing in the photo. These don't strike me as being graffiti per se, but a COM:DW of perhaps some other work (perhaps a photo like shown here and here) that might still be under copyright protection. It looks like these two elements were glued on top of the rest of the work. That could make things more complicated. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:16, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed with 1900-images: Test-image

[edit]

Hello! I have now uploaded a test-image which serves as a template for the remaining ca. 1900 images I am also going to upload via OpenRefine. Could someone please have a look at the page of this test image and tell me, if I made any significant error, so that I can adjust the template (the data is created using a Python-script) for the remaining images? Thank you in advance! CalRis25 (talk) 18:02, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does the image actually illustrate "abacus" or might it refer to another article on the same page? In the later case, I wouldn't include it in the filename. (I read the explanation on the file description page ("Alveus is the lemma or headword of the article, in which the image appears").
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 18:40, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes, the image does illustrate the word and article "abacus" The section Structure of the file name contains only an example for a file name. This section is the same for all 1900 images. I just changed the page to make it clear that the file name is merely an example. Is there anything else? CalRis25 (talk) 08:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Ok. It sometimes happens that similar works include an image on the same page, but not necessarily directly within the entry. Also I thought the section "Structure of the file name" was just for the test. If not, I'd add it in the information template with " | Other fields = ", probably as a template.
    I hoped someone might suggest you a different way to fill "description=", "source=" and "creator=", but I didn't comment on that aspect.
     ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 10:06, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the license. Yann (talk) 09:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks to both of you, Enhancing999 and Yann! I changed the template accordingly (note: I could not apply the license-fix to the structured data because PD-old-100-expired could not be reconciled with Wikidata). Otherwise, the output looks a lot nicer now due to the incorporation of the file name structure in the Information-Box. See test-image 6. If there are no further suggestions until tomorrow, I am going to start with the batch upload (first small chunks, later larger ones). CalRis25 (talk) 17:46, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@CalRis25: can you explain what you mean by "PD-old-100-expired could not be reconciled with Wikidata"? Copyright status for Lot and His Daughters (Q3837479) would appear to be exactly equivalent to that. - Jmabel ! talk 21:45, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At Abacus 4.1, I did a sample alternative formatting. The idea is to start with the description of the image "Abacus" and making that easily editable by other users. The remaining of the description being more static, it's in "other fields 1". Possibly "Type of object image is based on:" could be copied into the description as well. "Place of discovery" and "Place in 1849" maybe too, but they are empty in this sample.
 ∞∞ Enhancing999 (talk) 22:21, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

আমার ছবি আপলোড করতে চাই কিভাবে করবো অভিজ্ঞতা সম্পন্ন কেই সহযোগিতা করুন।

[edit]

আমার ছবি আপলোড করতে চাই কিভাবে করবো অভিজ্ঞতা সম্পন্ন কেই সহযোগিতা করুন। মহিউদ্দিন খান উইকিপিডিয়া (talk) 06:36, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Contents/hi, Commons:First_steps/Uploading_files/hi. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is not Hindi, but Bengali ;o). So rather Help:Contents/bn, Commons:First_steps/Uploading_files/bn. Yann (talk) 09:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yikes. I can confirm this was my error and DuckDuckGo got it correct. :/ Thanks/merci, Yann. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:25, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

গ্ৰামের ছবি নেই তাহলে কি করব

[edit]

গ্ৰামের ছবি নেই তাহলে কি করব Mizanur mondal (talk) 17:58, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(via Google Translate:) "What should I do if there is no picture of the village?"

Help needed with 273 images (move)

[edit]

All images (currently 273) in Category:Locator maps of Bundestag constituencies should be moved to the subcategory Bundestagswahlkreise 2025. Too many to move manually. Thanks 2003:E5:370F:FC00:F4D1:7BC:AB59:276E 22:13, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • ✓ Done I would like to strongly urge you to create an account. Trusting you on this required a leap of faith on my part, because I really don't know the subject matter here, and a particular IP address could easily be a different person than last edited from that address. If you edit while logged in to an account, it is much easier to be confident that you have a track record of being competent and well-intentioned. - Jmabel ! talk 22:48, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Help_desk&oldid=918830018"